Investigative Complaint Process

Share & Bookmark, Press Enter to show all options, press Tab go to next option
Print

INVESTIGATIVE COMPLAINT PROCESS REGARDING THE TITLE VI PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DISCRIMINATION LAW.

The City of Sioux City, Iowa operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes she or he has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a complaint with the City of Sioux City at City Hall, Human Rights Commission, 405 Sixth Street, Sioux City, Iowa 51101. Telephone: 712-279-6985

For more information about the Sioux City Civil Rights Program as it relates to Public Transit and the procedures to file a complaint, contact 712-279-6405, for hearing impaired TTY 712-279-0177; or visit the Public Transit Administrative Office at 509 Nebraska Street, Sioux City, Iowa 51101. Additional information may be found at sioux-city.org.

PROCESS

  1.  A complaint form is filled out by the complainant (the person alleging discrimination). If the complaint falls under any of the protected classes, a formal interview will take place with an investigator. The purpose of this interview is to gain a deeper understanding of the case.

The investigator makes sure that the alleged discrimination both happened in Sioux City and within the last 300 days. If the issue occurred outside city limits, a referral is made to the appropriate agency.

  1. Next, the Respondent (the party whom the complaint is directed) is formally notified and given an opportunity to respond to the allegations.
  2. Investigators will collect all information necessary to make a fair and impartial recommendation.

It is important for both the Complainant and the Respondent to realize that the Commission is neutral and will not form any opinions until all evidence is collected and analyzed. All information will remain strictly confidential.

  1. During the investigation, both parties will be asked to consider mediation. This allows them the opportunity to search for a private solution to existing conflicts without placing blame.
  • If mediation is attempted, the Investigator will remain neutral and not advise either side.
  • If mediation is successful, the Human Rights Commission will prepare a written agreement and the case will be “administratively closed”.
  • If mediation is not successful, the investigation will resume its natural course until completion.
  1. When the investigation reports are finally completed, a “Case Summary” will be prepared.
  • This will be submitted to three assigned Commissioners for use in determining a finding.
  • The Commissioners will each make a determination of either “probable cause” or “no probable cause”.
  • If there is reason to believe that discrimination exists, it is "probable cause". If not, it is "no probable cause".
  1. If a finding of “probable cause” is reached, the next step is mandatory Conciliation.

The purpose of conciliation is to assess the harm suffered and to determine a possible remedy. Conciliation, however, is not a forum to re-hash the investigation.

If an agreement is reached, the case will be closed. If conciliation is not reached, the Commissioners will determine if a public hearing of the case is justified. If not, the investigation will be closed.

  1. If a finding of “no probable cause” is reached, the investigation will be closed and no further action taken.

If the Complainant does not agree with the findings, the commission will reconsider, but only after new evidence (not previously considered) is provided.

This must be within a reasonable period of time (normally 10 days). Complainants have the option of suing the Respondent at their own expense.

  1. After a complaint has been properly filed a Complainant may then begin a lawsuit if:
  • The complainant has timely filed the complaint with the Commission
  • The complaint has been on file with the Commission for at least sixty days; and
  • The Commission has issued a “right to sue” letter to the Complainant.

If a “right to sue” letter is issued, the Human Rights Commission will close the case.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SCTS Discrimination Complaint Form 

Notes on the Complaint Process

All parties must understand that processing a complaint of discrimination is a sensitive and time consuming process. It is not uncommon for a case to take a year or longer to be resolved. The Human Rights Commission staff works to resolve matters as quickly as possible. We ask that Complainants and Respondents remain patient.

All complaints are cross-filed with the Federal Transit Administration – Region VII Office, Iowa Civil Rights Commission, and if appropriate with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

ADA Reasonable Modification Requests and Appeals

Sioux City Transit System (SCTS) is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of public transit services. These forms assist with compliance with 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 27, Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance, and Part 37, Transportation services for individuals with disabilities (ADA).  These forms constitute the formal means and procedures to incorporate appropriate due process standards and to provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by 49 CFR Parts 28, 37, 38, and 39.

SCTS ADA Reasonable Modification Form

SCTS Appeal Form